Over 374,000 UK citizens have signed a parliamentary petition demanding repeal of the Online Safety Act, far exceeding the 100,000 threshold for parliamentary debate. VPN downloads surged 1,800% as users seek to bypass age verification requirements, with five of the top ten UK App Store downloads being VPN services.
Despite widespread public opposition and international criticism, the government maintains it has “no plans to repeal” the Act, citing child protection as justification for the controversial legislation.
The Petition That Shocked Westminster
The parliamentary petition to repeal the Online Safety Act has become one of the fastest-growing in recent history, accumulating 374,248 signatures in just weeks following the Act’s enforcement. The petition argues that the legislation’s scope is “far broader and restrictive than is necessary in a free society“, expressing particular concern that even innocent online discussions about “trains, football, video games or even hamsters” could be affected by the Act’s sweeping content restrictions.
Petitioners specifically highlight the impact on small community forums and hobby websites that lack resources to comply with complex regulatory requirements. The petition states: “We think that Parliament should repeal the act and work towards producing proportionate legislation rather than risking clamping down on civil society talking about trains, football, video games or even hamsters because it can’t deal with individual bad faith actors.
The VPN Revolution
British citizens have responded to the Act’s implementation with unprecedented digital civil disobedience, with VPN usage experiencing an extraordinary 1,800% surge following the July 2025 enforcement deadline. Proton VPN reported massive spikes in UK sign-ups, while market analysis shows five of the top ten free applications on Apple’s UK App Store became VPN services as users sought to circumvent age verification requirements.
This VPN surge demonstrates the practical challenges of enforcing territorial internet restrictions and highlights the fundamental gap between government intentions and public acceptance of the new digital framework. Users are effectively voting with their digital feet, choosing to route their internet traffic through other countries rather than comply with UK age verification demands.
Government’s Defiant Response
The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology delivered a comprehensive response to the petition, firmly rejecting calls for repeal while acknowledging concerns about proportionality.
“The Government has no plans to repeal the Online Safety Act, and is working closely with Ofcom to implement the Act as quickly and effectively as possible to enable UK users to benefit from its protections”
Officials emphasised that Ofcom policy enforcement would take a risk-based and proportionate approach, focusing on larger platforms while supporting smaller services through guidance and tools. However, the response notably failed to address the petition’s core concern about the Online Safety Act’s broad scope affecting innocent online communities and discussions.
International Embarrassment
The scale of public opposition has created significant international embarrassment for the UK government, with global media coverage focusing on the citizen revolt against what many characterise as digital authoritarianism. The petition’s success has been highlighted in international press as evidence of democratic resistance to government overreach in internet regulation.
US politicians have cited the UK’s domestic opposition when criticizing the Act’s extraterritorial impact on American companies and users. The combination of massive petition signatures and VPN surge provides concrete evidence that the UK’s approach lacks public legitimacy and practical enforceability.
Policy Enforcement Reality Check
Despite government promises of proportionate implementation, early enforcement actions have validated petitioners’ concerns about overreach. Platforms, fearful of facing fines up to 10% of global revenue, have implemented overly broad content restrictions that affect legitimate educational content, news coverage, and community support forums exactly as petition signers predicted.
The practical impossibility of distinguishing between harmful and legitimate content has led to systematic over-censorship, with platforms choosing to restrict borderline content rather than risk regulatory penalties. This vindication of petition concerns has strengthened public opposition and provided ammunition for critics arguing the Act is fundamentally flawed.
Parliamentary Debate Implications
With signatures far exceeding the 100,000 threshold for parliamentary consideration, Westminster must now schedule a formal debate on the petition’s demands. The debate represents a crucial opportunity for opposition MPs to challenge the government’s implementation approach and demand specific protections for small platforms and community forums.
The parliamentary process also provides a platform for presenting evidence of the Act’s unintended consequences and technical failures, potentially forcing government ministers to acknowledge problems with the current implementation and consider amendments or exemptions for community platforms.
International Digital Rights Movement
The UK petition has inspired similar movements in other countries considering comparable legislation, with digital rights advocates citing British public opposition as evidence that citizens worldwide reject government internet control. The success demonstrates growing international awareness of the threats posed by expansive content regulation to online freedom and community building.
Digital rights organisations have highlighted the petition as proof that democratic societies will resist excessive internet regulation, providing a template for citizen opposition to similar legislative proposals in Australia, the EU, and various US states considering age verification requirements.
GB News: UK Dragged back to 1918 overnight
Related Resources: